I never really thought of it this way until I was recently perusing a book called, "Asthma and it's Radical Treatment," by Dr. James Adams. The book was written in 1913. Yet I believe the doctor was on to something when he wrote:
"Asthmatic sputum varies. Often there is none till the end of the attack; then it is in the typical form of small, tough pellets expelled by laborious coughing. The attack may then cease, or it may go on till a more free and profuse expectoration occurs."I think this makes sense because a normal, healthy person produces little sputum. So before the asthma attack, there wouldn't be much to cough up. It's only during the asthma attack that excess sputum is produced (except in a few hardluck asthmatics).
Asthmatics do have more goblet cells lining their respiratory tract than those without asthma. And during the attack, these goblet cells produce excess mucus. Due to the bronchospasm already occurring in the airways, this mucus becomes trapped inside the air passages.
Likewise, this mucus may further obstruct the airway. If the asthma attack is untreated long enough, mucus plugging may occur, and this may even further block entire passageways in the lungs. This results in less oxygen getting to the blood, increased dyspnea, and cyanosis (blue coloring of the skin).
Air is thus trapped in the lungs, so the asthmatic feels as though he cannot get air in. This makes sense considering there already is air trapped in the lungs. Expiration is prolonged and wheezy.
If the asthma attack is bad enough, there may be no wheeze. Yet as the asthma attack lets up (either by modern medicines or by pure luck) the muscles lining the air passages relax and this excess sputum is released. The patient experiences long coughing jags. At first the cough may be dry and non-productive.
When I was in this stage, my neck and chest would feel as though someone were down there with a feather tickling me. I would feel panicky and anxious. I would feel like this.
![]() |
| Charcot-Leyden Crystals |
As far back as 1913, Adams described asthma sputum this way:
"The sputum does not readily decompose, and is said to be wonderfully free from microbes; but this is not always so, as I have occasionally found it teeming with them."Of course sometimes it might be these microbes that triggers the asthma attack. In this case it would be normal to find microbes in the sputum, but most of the time the sputum would be sterile.
The reason this is interesting is that the purpose of mucus production is to trap microbes and bring them up to the upper respiratory tract to be swallowed or expectorated.
Normally there should be little mucus or sputum production. The purpose of this response is to keep the lungs, particularly the periphery of the lungs, sterile. So unless there is an infection in the lungs, it only makes sense that sputum produced at the end of an acute asthma attack would be sterile also. This excess sputum was not produced to fight off an infection, it was produced to fight off some asthma trigger.
Other than bacteria and the virus, most asthma triggers are things that don't bother people without asthma, and, thus, are not infections. Therefore, in most cases, asthma sputum is sterile.
What should be present in the sputum of asthmatics is eosinophils. These are produced by the immune system during the allergic reaction.
Again, with asthma, the allergic reaction may be generated to attack some irritant that is generally considered safe, yet the immune system of the asthmatic is confused into thinking good things are bad and tries to get rid of them.
During this response, eosinophils are released, and this spearheads a reaction that results in increased inflammation. Mast cells that harbor leukotrienes and histammines and other mediators of inflammation are released into the blood stream, and it's these that cause inflammation of the eyes, nose, throat, and bronchioles.
J.B. Berkart, in his 1878 book "On Asthma: Its Pathology and Treatment," (page 31) wrote about Dr. Beau who worked with his pupil Crozant in 1851 to come up with his observation that asthma attacks end with a spit of sputum. They believed asthma was caused by increased sputum and resolved when sputum breaks up with coughing fit.
Berkart explained that Beau basically believed asthma was a disease of chronic catarrh, which is essentially inflammation or swelling of the airways. If we could jump into our time machine we could tell him he was right. He believed this sputum was capable of obstructing the airway, and this is what caused the symptoms of dyspnea we refer to as asthma, "as well as the sonorous and sibilant rhonchi -- their 'rales vibrants."
(Sonorous rhonchi is the sound of secretions moving through the air passages, and most medical experts now refer to this as rhonchi, and sibilant rhonchi is a constant high pitch of air moving through narrowed air passages in the lungs and we now refer to this as a wheeze).
Thus, Berkart wrote, "with the displacement of the mucous plug into the larger bronchus, or on its expulsion by means of a fit of coughing, the dyspnea ceases, and with it also the rales disappear. This form of bronchitis is, in their (Beau and Crozant) opinion, due partly to an idiosyncrasy of the patient, partly to exciting causes, which greatly vary in different individuals."
![]() |
| Jean Martin Charcot (1825-93) |
Leyden mistakenly believed the these crystals caused asthma.
In 1879 bacteriologist Paul Erlich discovered the eosinophil, and it was soon discovered that elevated levels of eosinophils (eosinophilia) was commonly found in asthmatics, according to Encyclopedia of Allergies (Myron Lipkowitz and Tova Navarra, 2001).
In 1882 Heinrich Curshmann observed other spirals in asthma sputum and believed they were associated with causing asthma, according to Emergency Medicine (Barry E. Brenner, Ed, 1998, page 10). He believed since Leyden's crystals didn't cause asthma, perhaps his crystals did.
![]() |
| Ernst Victor von Leyden (1832-1910) |
Quite often doctors can now tell if someone is having an asthma attack if the level of eosinophils is increased in either the blood, sputum or both. This isn't always the case, yet if there's an allergic cause of the asthma attack, they most surely will be increased.
![]() |
| Heinrich Curshmann (1846-1910) |
So the allergic reaction is a major reason for increased sputum, and eosinophils are often in it, but generally not bacteria or viruses.
This, coupled with bronchospasm, results in airway narrowing, air trapping, and the ensuing chest tightness, dyspnea, tickling feeling, and overall feeling of impending doom.
Adams observed eosinophils in his 1913 book, and also way back in 1878 in his book, "On Asthma: Its pathology and treatment," J.B. Berkart also noted eosinophils.
![]() |
| Hermann Sahli (1856-1933) |
Sahli could isolate the area where the sputum came from based on epithelial cells in it, yet he did not understand the mechanisms of its production as we do today.
So now you know why asthma sputum is white, and the history of how the etiology of white asthma sputum came to be known by asthma experts worldwide.
(Check out the sputum lexicon)






