I'm sure I'm not the only asthmatic to wake up in the middle of the night short of breath and not have a clue where his four Albuterol inhalers are, yet be too exhausted to get out of bed to look for them.
That's the situation I found myself in last night. After working all week, and working out when I wasn't working, and chasing kids around when I wasn't doing any of those two, I was perhaps more exhausted last evening than I remember being since I started working day shift last January.
In fact, I was so pooped out last night I went to bed at 7 p.m. without even taking any of my medicine. I actually lied down intending to watch the Tigers, yet I don't remember what happened as I fell asleep from pure exhaustion.
So I think Inhaler Gremlin has been at my house. I think it feasts on inhalers that are sitting around. Hell, it feeds on inhalers that are brand new and not even out of the package yet.
Anyway, if I had gotten out of bed I would have found one on the table next to the couch. For some reason the Gremlin didn't eat that one. Yet I didn't get up, and despite my discomfort fell back asleep.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
unfortunate asthmatics
I guess I'm not too surprised that most asthmatics don't take their medicine as prescribed, as my doctor hinted at in this post. Honestly, there was a time when yours truly wasn't the best asthmatic patient either. Yet why does it have to be this way?
So if your doctor prescribes for you to take Advair to control your asthma, why would you not take it. Better yet, If you quit taking your asthma controller meds once you start feeling better, does this make you a goofus asthmatic?
My regular readers know the goofus asthmatic, as he is the asthmatic who is lazy, or who does everything wrong. He fails to take his medicine as prescribed, and he ultimately ends up back in the emergency room.
Yet, does lack of wisdom, and lack of a good asthma doctor, make the patient a goofus asthmatic. Truly, I don't think so. I can even give you a reason I think this way. Actually, I think the reason is doctors. I think poor education. I think unfortunate asthmatic.
There you have it, another asthma type. The Unfortunate asthmatic is the asthmatic who would be a gallant asthmatic if only he knew better; if only he were better instructed by his physician; and if only his doctor was on his case when he didn't take his medicine.
A recent study performed by researchers at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit shows that, "patients are more likely to routinely take inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma control when physicians kept close watch over their medication use and reviewed detailed electronic prescription information, including how often patients fill their prescriptions and the estimated number of days each prescription would last."
The researchers also noted that: "Unfortunately, overall patient adherence to ICS medication is poor, accounting for an estimated 60 percent of asthma hospitalizations. So it's important, as we move forward with health care reform, to look for more effective ways to make sure patients stay with their prescription regimens."
This sounds like common sense that a doctor would follow their patients, yet I know from my own personal experience that even the best asthma doctors do not necessarily follow their patients outside the hospital unless a patient ends up sick or something.
I'm not saying doctors are bad, by no means am I doing that. And the way doctors are rushed by too many patients may actually encourage them to want to get the patient out of the office as quick as they can so they can move on to the next patient.
Still, it only seems like common sense if every doctor would follow the guidelines set forth in this post, they would all be gallant asthma doctors.
For example, your doctor should know what medicines you are on, how often you are using your medicine, and should always ask how your asthma has been the past 2 weeks. If your doctor notices you are not taking your medicine, then you ought to get a lashing. Well, not really, but he should ask to see you.
And, essentially, doctors who were allowed to keep track of their patients prescriptions, so that if you weren't taking your Advair he could make you aware of how important it is that you take your Advair especially when you are feeling well.
Sure there might come a time when you no longer need your asthma controller medicines, yet your doctor ought to tell you that chances are if you have asthma you will probably have to take these medicines the rest of your life -- not just until you feel better.
In a sense, asthma medicines are like blood pressure medicines: you need to take them exactly as prescribed. Yet it appears that not only do most asthma doctors not think of it this way, neither do patients. Yet, it's hard to get patients to be compliant when the doctor isn't.
So, henceforth, we have the unfortunate asthmatic: The asthmatic who quits taking his asthma medicines because he starts feeling better. He does this because his doctor, or other medical professional, has not properly educated him on the importance of taking asthma controller medicines especially when you are feeling well.
Unfortunate asthmatics may give the appearance of goofus asthmatics, or sometimer asthmatics, or even poor patient asthmatics. Yet in reality, they are the victims of poor education more so than anything.
And, quite frankly, I'm not sure what an be done about this. Doctors are not lazy, they are simply busy and humble, and don't want to be overbearing.
Yet, perhaps, as this study shows, if doctors are able to follow their patients medicine usage, perhaps they can better stay in touch with what their patients are doing, and take the time to educate.
So if your doctor prescribes for you to take Advair to control your asthma, why would you not take it. Better yet, If you quit taking your asthma controller meds once you start feeling better, does this make you a goofus asthmatic?
My regular readers know the goofus asthmatic, as he is the asthmatic who is lazy, or who does everything wrong. He fails to take his medicine as prescribed, and he ultimately ends up back in the emergency room.
Yet, does lack of wisdom, and lack of a good asthma doctor, make the patient a goofus asthmatic. Truly, I don't think so. I can even give you a reason I think this way. Actually, I think the reason is doctors. I think poor education. I think unfortunate asthmatic.
There you have it, another asthma type. The Unfortunate asthmatic is the asthmatic who would be a gallant asthmatic if only he knew better; if only he were better instructed by his physician; and if only his doctor was on his case when he didn't take his medicine.
A recent study performed by researchers at Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit shows that, "patients are more likely to routinely take inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthma control when physicians kept close watch over their medication use and reviewed detailed electronic prescription information, including how often patients fill their prescriptions and the estimated number of days each prescription would last."
The researchers also noted that: "Unfortunately, overall patient adherence to ICS medication is poor, accounting for an estimated 60 percent of asthma hospitalizations. So it's important, as we move forward with health care reform, to look for more effective ways to make sure patients stay with their prescription regimens."
This sounds like common sense that a doctor would follow their patients, yet I know from my own personal experience that even the best asthma doctors do not necessarily follow their patients outside the hospital unless a patient ends up sick or something.
I'm not saying doctors are bad, by no means am I doing that. And the way doctors are rushed by too many patients may actually encourage them to want to get the patient out of the office as quick as they can so they can move on to the next patient.
Still, it only seems like common sense if every doctor would follow the guidelines set forth in this post, they would all be gallant asthma doctors.
For example, your doctor should know what medicines you are on, how often you are using your medicine, and should always ask how your asthma has been the past 2 weeks. If your doctor notices you are not taking your medicine, then you ought to get a lashing. Well, not really, but he should ask to see you.
And, essentially, doctors who were allowed to keep track of their patients prescriptions, so that if you weren't taking your Advair he could make you aware of how important it is that you take your Advair especially when you are feeling well.
Sure there might come a time when you no longer need your asthma controller medicines, yet your doctor ought to tell you that chances are if you have asthma you will probably have to take these medicines the rest of your life -- not just until you feel better.
In a sense, asthma medicines are like blood pressure medicines: you need to take them exactly as prescribed. Yet it appears that not only do most asthma doctors not think of it this way, neither do patients. Yet, it's hard to get patients to be compliant when the doctor isn't.
So, henceforth, we have the unfortunate asthmatic: The asthmatic who quits taking his asthma medicines because he starts feeling better. He does this because his doctor, or other medical professional, has not properly educated him on the importance of taking asthma controller medicines especially when you are feeling well.
Unfortunate asthmatics may give the appearance of goofus asthmatics, or sometimer asthmatics, or even poor patient asthmatics. Yet in reality, they are the victims of poor education more so than anything.
And, quite frankly, I'm not sure what an be done about this. Doctors are not lazy, they are simply busy and humble, and don't want to be overbearing.
Yet, perhaps, as this study shows, if doctors are able to follow their patients medicine usage, perhaps they can better stay in touch with what their patients are doing, and take the time to educate.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Do most asthmatics avoid Advair like the plague?
Perhaps one of my fellow asthmatics can help me out with this one. I recently saw a new asthma doctor, and, when I asked to have my prescriptions refilled he said, "You like Advair?"
"Yes! I love it!" I said.
"Wow! You're one of the few asthmatics who can stand it!"
"What!"
"Yeah. Most of my other patients hate that medicine." I will assume that he is also referring to any medicine like Advair too, such as symbicort.
"What do they take for their asthma then."
He smirked and said, "Well, nothing. They come in every 6 months complaining of asthma problems."
"Interesting," I said. The conversation moved on from there, although the idea that Advair was as unpopular as he was saying is still wobbling around in my mind, hence this post. I guess the naive person inside my head "assumed" if there's a medicine that works as well as Advair and Symbicort do to control asthma, that most asthmatics would at least try to like it.
Although, according to doctor Axel, that's not the case. Yet I think one of the reasons this threw me off guard is because my old doctor, Dr. Best, told me the opposite: "Most of my patients love Advair."
It's interesting the different perspective a doctor can have on a medicine. Yet this latest discussion about Advair has me wondering: do most asthmatics remain ignorant and continue to have
I wonder, though, if most asthmatics hate Advair if it has to do with the long-acting beta adrenergic medicine (Serevent) in it. I wrote here how it actually took me 10 years to get used to Serevent, and that I actually had to wean myself onto Advair.
Yet I don't think most doctors think about weaning onto a medicine, and when a patient says they can't take it, that's the end of the discussion. Yet I will contend, if you have uncontrolled asthma, Advair may just be the key and you should wean yourself onto it. You should try gallantly to get your body used to the stuff.
So, facts confirm Advair works wonders for asthma. Yet, is it a fact that most asthmatics continue to avoid Advair (and Symbicort) like the plague? If you have any greater wisdom on this cue your wisdom into the comments below or email me. .
"Yes! I love it!" I said.
"Wow! You're one of the few asthmatics who can stand it!"
"What!"
"Yeah. Most of my other patients hate that medicine." I will assume that he is also referring to any medicine like Advair too, such as symbicort.
"What do they take for their asthma then."
He smirked and said, "Well, nothing. They come in every 6 months complaining of asthma problems."
"Interesting," I said. The conversation moved on from there, although the idea that Advair was as unpopular as he was saying is still wobbling around in my mind, hence this post. I guess the naive person inside my head "assumed" if there's a medicine that works as well as Advair and Symbicort do to control asthma, that most asthmatics would at least try to like it.
Although, according to doctor Axel, that's not the case. Yet I think one of the reasons this threw me off guard is because my old doctor, Dr. Best, told me the opposite: "Most of my patients love Advair."
It's interesting the different perspective a doctor can have on a medicine. Yet this latest discussion about Advair has me wondering: do most asthmatics remain ignorant and continue to have
I wonder, though, if most asthmatics hate Advair if it has to do with the long-acting beta adrenergic medicine (Serevent) in it. I wrote here how it actually took me 10 years to get used to Serevent, and that I actually had to wean myself onto Advair.
Yet I don't think most doctors think about weaning onto a medicine, and when a patient says they can't take it, that's the end of the discussion. Yet I will contend, if you have uncontrolled asthma, Advair may just be the key and you should wean yourself onto it. You should try gallantly to get your body used to the stuff.
So, facts confirm Advair works wonders for asthma. Yet, is it a fact that most asthmatics continue to avoid Advair (and Symbicort) like the plague? If you have any greater wisdom on this cue your wisdom into the comments below or email me. .
Wednesday, June 09, 2010
Just this once I'm going to gloat
If you're going to set a goal, you might as well work hard at it. I've seen many of my co-workers and friends get vexed that they haven't been losing weight, yet when you ask them about their diet and exercise you can tell right away the reason.
Basically, there is one sure way to lose weight, and that is to work hard. The most important step is diet. If you put in less fuel than your body uses, you'll lose weight. If you add muscle, your metabolism rate will increase, and this will help you lose weight faster. If you do both, you're sure to lose weight.
The bottom line is: you have to change your diet and exercise routine. You have to change something. You certainly aren't going to wish your weight away. That's what I think some people do. They try to wish it away. Fat chance.
Yet as a few of my coworkers have whined recently: "Why are you losing weight and we aren't. It's because you're a guy," or, "It's because you got more time."
Wrong! It's because I make an effort. I work hard. I give 110% to my goal. And I don't let little minor set backs cause me to quit. I have weak moments where I can't help but to eat that cookie or cake or whatever, yet once that's done and fully enjoyed I move on and get back on the train and keep on a rolling.
Yet I never say that, except to my few closest friends. Most people who complain to me get a simple, "Well, that stinks." Yet, what I won't give them is the old," well, maybe you're just at your natural weight," which is what I think some of them want. I don't give out sympathy. I don't because I worked my ass off to finally get down to 189.4, which is what I weighted in at today.
And, I'm sorry, yet as I stepped on the scale, thinking of that 210 that I weighed in as on April 4, 2010, I couldn't help to think, as I saw the scale tip out at 189.4: Woo Hoo!
No sympathy for winy butts here, and no gloating either. Your humble RT and fellow asthmatic knows as well as the next kid in town that what one works arduously to obtain can disappear in a heartbeat if one isn't careful.
So, since I can't gloat in the real world, since I'm forced to be humble, just this once I'm going to gloat: WOO HOO! I won't do it again.
Basically, there is one sure way to lose weight, and that is to work hard. The most important step is diet. If you put in less fuel than your body uses, you'll lose weight. If you add muscle, your metabolism rate will increase, and this will help you lose weight faster. If you do both, you're sure to lose weight.
The bottom line is: you have to change your diet and exercise routine. You have to change something. You certainly aren't going to wish your weight away. That's what I think some people do. They try to wish it away. Fat chance.
Yet as a few of my coworkers have whined recently: "Why are you losing weight and we aren't. It's because you're a guy," or, "It's because you got more time."
Wrong! It's because I make an effort. I work hard. I give 110% to my goal. And I don't let little minor set backs cause me to quit. I have weak moments where I can't help but to eat that cookie or cake or whatever, yet once that's done and fully enjoyed I move on and get back on the train and keep on a rolling.
Yet I never say that, except to my few closest friends. Most people who complain to me get a simple, "Well, that stinks." Yet, what I won't give them is the old," well, maybe you're just at your natural weight," which is what I think some of them want. I don't give out sympathy. I don't because I worked my ass off to finally get down to 189.4, which is what I weighted in at today.
And, I'm sorry, yet as I stepped on the scale, thinking of that 210 that I weighed in as on April 4, 2010, I couldn't help to think, as I saw the scale tip out at 189.4: Woo Hoo!
No sympathy for winy butts here, and no gloating either. Your humble RT and fellow asthmatic knows as well as the next kid in town that what one works arduously to obtain can disappear in a heartbeat if one isn't careful.
So, since I can't gloat in the real world, since I'm forced to be humble, just this once I'm going to gloat: WOO HOO! I won't do it again.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010
Burnout!! Time for vacation
I have some empathy for all those whiners on the Biggest Loser as I've been putting myself through a rigorous routine of working out the past few weeks in preparation for final weigh-in for the biggest loser competition we've been having at work.
Today I put myself through my own version of the last chance workout, where when I got done I was so worn out I could hardly move my arms to wash myself. That was a great workout, and perhaps my best ever. Hopefully it shows on the scale tomorrow. Yet, even if it doesn't, I'm happy with the results.
After I weight in I'm going to take three days off. I'm going to Mackinac City (no not to the island) with my wife and kids for vacation, and I'm not going to think about exercise and diet. I'm going to eat and drink and not exercise all I want. Then when I get back I'll get back on the train.
It's kind of a lifestyle I'm trying to maintain here, so I think days off are good. If you go to long not doing the things you enjoy you're going to set yourself up for the inevitable crash, and I don't want that to happen this time (it's happened many times before).
As I've written before, when an asthmatic is going on vacation he can't just walk out the door and leave. He has to plan ahead. So the Advair is packed and so is the box of generic Claritin and benadryl . These are must packs to PREVENT the inevitable allergens that hide in hotel rooms from irritating my allergies and asthma.
Oh, and definitely the Albuterol inhaler. Even now, the day before, bronchodilator anxiety is setting in. I've checked about 10 times to make sure my inhalers were where I put them. And, I know, once I get in the car I'll check my pockets. It's insanity. It's like my obsessive compulsion.
We're probably not going to have ideal weather for this time of year, but so long as it doesn't rain we will all be happy. And, regardless -- even if I have to sit in a hotel room for three days -- this RT will come back fully refreshed, and hopefully with a few blog ideas.
Burned out from working out too hard and working too hard. I've been running every day, rain or shine. And now I'm paying for it.
So, for sanity purposes, I'm outa here -- tomorrow.
See ya!!
Today I put myself through my own version of the last chance workout, where when I got done I was so worn out I could hardly move my arms to wash myself. That was a great workout, and perhaps my best ever. Hopefully it shows on the scale tomorrow. Yet, even if it doesn't, I'm happy with the results.
After I weight in I'm going to take three days off. I'm going to Mackinac City (no not to the island) with my wife and kids for vacation, and I'm not going to think about exercise and diet. I'm going to eat and drink and not exercise all I want. Then when I get back I'll get back on the train.
It's kind of a lifestyle I'm trying to maintain here, so I think days off are good. If you go to long not doing the things you enjoy you're going to set yourself up for the inevitable crash, and I don't want that to happen this time (it's happened many times before).
As I've written before, when an asthmatic is going on vacation he can't just walk out the door and leave. He has to plan ahead. So the Advair is packed and so is the box of generic Claritin and benadryl . These are must packs to PREVENT the inevitable allergens that hide in hotel rooms from irritating my allergies and asthma.
Oh, and definitely the Albuterol inhaler. Even now, the day before, bronchodilator anxiety is setting in. I've checked about 10 times to make sure my inhalers were where I put them. And, I know, once I get in the car I'll check my pockets. It's insanity. It's like my obsessive compulsion.
We're probably not going to have ideal weather for this time of year, but so long as it doesn't rain we will all be happy. And, regardless -- even if I have to sit in a hotel room for three days -- this RT will come back fully refreshed, and hopefully with a few blog ideas.
Burned out from working out too hard and working too hard. I've been running every day, rain or shine. And now I'm paying for it.
So, for sanity purposes, I'm outa here -- tomorrow.
See ya!!
Saturday, June 05, 2010
Wheezing in the front seat
I met my mother at a local restaurant a few days ago and somehow the discussion evolved into car seats, and how my 1.5 year old daughter is still in a rear facing seat, and my 7 year old uses a booster seat.
Yet then we traveled down memory lane back to 1977 when I was the 7-year old, and my older brother was 8 and my younger brother 6. Not only did we not have car seats and booster seats, we didn't even wear our seat belts. In fact, we didn't even sit.
Mom said, "I remember you guys all standing. In fact, I remember you falling asleep in the front seat, and when I had to stand on the breaks I instinctively put my arm out to prevent you from falling forward. It's funny how you never even though about this back then as being dangerous.
"In fact," she continued, "I think you are the one who always had to be in the front seat because your brothers couldn't stand the way you breathed. They were picky that way, and very irritable. They'd tease you and start fights. So I had to put you in the front seat."
"You were sneezing and sniffling and your mouth breathing was loud, and you were always wheezing. You were always sick like that. So that's why we had you in the front seat."
I think it's neat how we have progresses as a community. My mom actually let me wheeze and sniff and sneeze because there wasn't really anything she could do. And, to prevent me from fighting from my brothers, she made me stand in the front seat, where I was even at greater risk from dying of a head contusion than of asthma.
I was thinking this, although I didn't say it to her. I guess this is all proof that we do the best we can with the wisdom before us, yet as we know better we do better. Now, if our kids are wheezing and sniffling, we treat it and hopefully prevent it. And we definitely secure our kids in their car seats. Well, at least my wife and I do.
Yet then we traveled down memory lane back to 1977 when I was the 7-year old, and my older brother was 8 and my younger brother 6. Not only did we not have car seats and booster seats, we didn't even wear our seat belts. In fact, we didn't even sit.
Mom said, "I remember you guys all standing. In fact, I remember you falling asleep in the front seat, and when I had to stand on the breaks I instinctively put my arm out to prevent you from falling forward. It's funny how you never even though about this back then as being dangerous.
"In fact," she continued, "I think you are the one who always had to be in the front seat because your brothers couldn't stand the way you breathed. They were picky that way, and very irritable. They'd tease you and start fights. So I had to put you in the front seat."
"You were sneezing and sniffling and your mouth breathing was loud, and you were always wheezing. You were always sick like that. So that's why we had you in the front seat."
I think it's neat how we have progresses as a community. My mom actually let me wheeze and sniff and sneeze because there wasn't really anything she could do. And, to prevent me from fighting from my brothers, she made me stand in the front seat, where I was even at greater risk from dying of a head contusion than of asthma.
I was thinking this, although I didn't say it to her. I guess this is all proof that we do the best we can with the wisdom before us, yet as we know better we do better. Now, if our kids are wheezing and sniffling, we treat it and hopefully prevent it. And we definitely secure our kids in their car seats. Well, at least my wife and I do.
Friday, June 04, 2010
The fox and the fawn
Even while most health experts recommend doing your high interval aerobic workout in the morning, due to my schedule it's something that's a rarity for me. Although this morning the opportunity presented itself.It's a nice trail I take at the city park. It allows me to get my daily dose of the wild, although there are wildernesses all over where I live. There's the Manistee National Forest, and then there's where I grew up which is pretty much in the woods.
During my training sessions through the city park where I walk around a 0.93 mile paved bike path that takes me through the woods, to a lake with a dock, past the city campground, and then back deeper into the woods where the path comes full circle back to the docks again.
It's a city park, so you can hear cars whooshing in the distance. Yet it's still the middle of the woods. There's talk of building a dog campground, which is a fenced in area where people can walk their dogs. I'm hoping this doesn't distract from the outdoorsiness.
I see lots of wild animals, although mainly just the common one's like rabbits, squirrels, chipmunks, snakes and the like. It's neat, however, how you can get up to a few feet from a deer, and the deer will stand still and stare at you without taking off -- which is what they normally do. In a sense, all this wildlife is tame to humans.
Today I saw a doe twice, and both times it was scared away. Actually, the first time it I took it as an opportunity to stop, and it stared at me for a few minutes, until it decided it better not take it's chances with me. After completing my workout I decided to walk the 0.93 mile circuit through the park when it started to lightly sprinkle.
So here I was completely alone, never passing a soul. I was thinking how cool it was to be out here by myself, listening to the birds chirping, the constant shuffling of leaves as one squirrel was chasing another, or a raccoon shuffled across the creek to my right. There's always a lot of wildlife activity in the woods, but never as much as there was today.
There are also signs placed here and there with one animal track on each one. When you lift the sign up you can see what animal's tracks is represented. I passed one that said "Cougar" and observed that the top of the sign had been ripped off, probably by vandals. I was thinking how cool it would be to see a cougar. I had never seen a cougar before.
You think about cougars as something you'd see out west in the mountains, but believe it or not they have been spotted up here in northern Michigan. However, I think in the west they are called mountain lions, but the truth is both cougars and mountain lions are one and the same. I think that's true anyway.
So here I'm walking in the rain and there's all this wildlife. You here a lot that wildlife goes into hiding during the rain, and that this is often a sign that it's going to rain. Yet I don't think that's necessarily true either, unless the animals sense a severe storm. Right then it was just lightly sprinkling. It was a cool rain, at the temperature was 65, but it was raining nonetheless.
About half way around the circle I was closing in to the point where there is a pond to my right, and I could hear the croaking of frogs even though I couldn't yet see the pond. On the other side of this pond was a city campground, which gives you an idea how close people are to where I was. Although I was, by all means, in the middle of the woods.
So it was about at this spot that I'm thinking how cool it would be to be one of the few people to see a cougar. There are also bear in the area, but you don't hear about them unless they get into the city and start wandering around. Bears are curious animals. I heard a story recently by one of my patients about a bear coming right up to their house and getting into their trash. When she woke in the morning she could see the tracks. I've also heard of cougars walking right up to screen doors and my friends that happened to be inside the house watched as the cougar ran off.
You hear these stories from time to time, and occasionally there is a story in the paper about a cougar track, although to actually observe one of these critters is a rarity. In fact, it's so rare some people don't even believe these animals exist.
So, I'm thinking about this, and then I hear a scuttling of leaves to my left. I'm thinking it's just a squirrel, or a bird, or a chipmunk, or a snake, or a skunk, or a rabbit, or a deer, or some common animal like that I see often. Yet what I saw was a little red fox, no larger than a rabbit, running through the woods. Then, right behind it, was that same doe that I had scared away twice while running earlier.
The fox and doe both disappeared in the woods, but it was in the direction my path was heading. So, after I passed the pond and a track which lead to the campground, the path turned left. I was on the lookout for the deer or the fox. I saw, standing in the woods, a fawn. I stood there and stared at it for at least five minutes. It moved maybe once or twice, but if you weren't observant you might not even have spotted it. So, now I'm thinking, what I saw must have been this doe, and not a fox.
Yet, at about the five minute mark, a fox sprinted from behind the fawn, and the fawn chased the fox into the bushes right next to the track ahead of me. Now I was reminded of the fox and the hound, only in this case it was the fox and the fawn. I figured I'd certainly see the duo again as I passed the bushes they ran into, yet there wasn't a peep. They had disappeared. If I wanted to I probably could have scared them out, but I continued on my way.
While there's lots of foxes up here, you don't see one very often. I grew up 20 miles from where I do now more in the country, and I only saw a fox once scamper across the yard. I knew of a
few fox dens, yet never actually saw one.
Anyway, it's just neat what you see when you're in the woods. Sometimes I find painters sitting in the woods drawing what they see. Sometimes I stop to talk, although most of the time I decide they don't like to be bothered. Well, actually, most of the time when I'm out there I'm busy doing my workout routine.It's moments like this I wish I could carry my camera when I'm running. Yet I never do and probably never will.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)