Thursday, November 29, 2012

Hardluck Asthma: a top 10 asthma blog

Wow, I was surfing the net and I came upon the top 10 asthma blogs of 2012, and this blog was listed.  I imagine I was informed of this a while back, although I've been so busy working, raising a family, and blogging that I must have overlooked it.  It was over at healthline.com.

I really love what they wrote about my blog:
The asthma dad/asthmatic blogger at Hardluck Asthma keeps the punches rolling. This funny, informative blog keeps readers “Inhaling Lung Wisdom” with every post. He offers personal stories and a thorough, well-researched history of asthma and related lung conditions. One of the most educational and unique blogs on asthma, Hardluck Asthma blends innovative takes on asthma lore with true tales of hard-knock asthma history. From here, hop to the author’s other blogs – all great reads, all with a touch of asthma flair. 
I just want to say thanks to all my readers for inspiring me to go on with this.  Every time I read something like this, every time I hear kind words from my readers (fellow asthmatics and non-asthmatics alike), it encourages me to keep breathing forward. 

I suppose if my blog were a book, this would be a perfect fit for my back cover.  I think I'll have to find a place to stick this in my about page. 

A quote here is fitting.   
Kind words are more effective than the best of gifts, and if you are really concerned, you will give both. (Sirach 18:17)
Thanks everyone, and have a great day. 

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Note to self: Yes I still have hardluck asthma

So my breathing is greatly improved these days.  I have come to the conclusion that even a longtime hardluck asthmatic can suffer from the common asthma symptom of: "I felt so good for so long I forgot I had it."

If you have asthma you know what I mean.  You go so long feeling good you start to feel invincible.  You start to do things you know you shouldn't, like mow the lawn without wearing a mask. 

It all started for me in the spring of 2010.  I was feeling great, so I told my doctor I credit him for me feeling better. So by the spring of 2011 my new doctor decided to start tinkering with my medicine. 

He takes me off Advair 250 and puts me on Symbicort.  He tells me most of his asthmatics can't tell any difference with Singulair, and if I want I can start weaning myself off it.  So I do and I do.  I also quit taking my daily dose of Claratin. 

And I do all this for another reason too: money.  The cost of taking all these medicines starts to add up.  If I could just take a daily dose of Symbicort and scrap all those other meds, that would save my wallet some.

Then in October of 2011 I had my worse asthma attack in at least five years during hunting camp.  A few months later I have two more bad asthma attacks doing simple things, like organizing old VCR tapes that probably had more dust on them than I observed.  Then I had another asthma attack while cleaning under my bed and closet. 

For the first time in a long time I was placed on steroids.  For the first time in a long time I had to see my doctor every 2-3 months because my asthma was no longer controlled.  For the first time in a long time I felt like my asthma had the better of me.  For the first time in a long time I felt defeated.

Then October 2012 happened.  I told my doctor I'm going to scrap all the experiments.  I went back on my Advair, only this time it was Advair 500.  I went back on Singulair, only now it was generic and costs much less.  I put myself back on Claritin, the generic form also. 

And, lo and behold, my asthma is back to normal.  I can take a deep breath and not feel the wheezing inside my chest, and the tightness.  I can do things around the house, like normal things, and not be knocked down 2 days to 2 weeks. 

Surely I have also been avoiding things that bother me, like dust.  I have made a gallant effort, once again, to let someone else do the moving of the lawn, the raking of leaves, and the like.  I do as little messing around in closets and under beds as possible.  Although I did do some cleaning in my daughters room (something normal people do) and I didn't have trouble breathing.

Yes, this is a testament of the fact that asthma never goes away.  A gallant asthmatic must never forget he has asthma.  Plus, a gallant asthmatic doctor must also never forget that asthma doesn't go away.  Plus a gallant asthmatic doctor must know when what is working is working, and to leave well enough alone. 

Perhaps we'll call this a good reminder and lesson learned. 

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

206-220 A.D.: Quack doctors kill people

If you had asthma in Ancient China in the 3rd century A.D. you had access to some rational treatment for your asthma, most significantly Ma Huang, which was an asthma remedy discovered for the west at the beginning of the 19th century.  It's a medicine almost as potent as epinephrine with the ability of quickly ending an asthma attack.

Yet chances are you were very hesitent to see a doctor.  Some historians speculate, based on writings of the era, that many Chinese people feared physicians.  According to Plinio Prioreschi, in his 1991 book "A History of Medicine," "Little is known about the social position of physicians in the earlier times.  We know that later, and throughout Chinese history, they were often the object of derision and scorn.  In the Spring and Autumn Annals of the State of Lu (one of the feudal states in which Confucius was born in 551 B.C.), for example, we read: (Physicians) employed poisonous drugs to expel diseases, hence ancients despised and assigned them a low position in society."

Plinio lists many ancient proverbs that show the inferiority of doctors, such as:
  • Doctors cannot cure their own complaints. (Huai an Tsu)
  • What the doctor says is all right, but what he sells is false.(Proverb)
  • Quack doctors kill people (proverb)
  • Do not take medicine compounded by a doctor who is not backed by the experience of three generations.
  • Medicine does not kill; the physicians kill (Proverb)
  • To take no medicine is the best cure. (Proverb)
However, some debate that doctors were held to such a low status in China.  Some believe these were just proverbs warning people to be careful, and not to seek medicine if they could resolve their medical problems on their own with household remedies. 

If you lived in Ancient China during the Han Dynasties of 206-220 A.D. you would have been wise to be wary of quack medicine, although you'd also be wise to seek a doctor who was knowledgeable of the medicine called Ma Huang.  Hopefully you'd learn to find the plant yourself, to prepare it into a powder, and to mix it into a tea to drink when your asthma acted up. 

Reference:
  • Prioreschi, plinia, "A History of Medicine," volume I "Primitive and Ancient Medicine," 1991, The Edwin Mellen Press, New York, chapter II, pages 124-5

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

3000-900 B.C.: Asthmatic boy in Babylon

So as soon as we get back from Ancient Egypt our time machine is ready for another journey, and we're asked to quickly board so we don't upset the time space equilibrium, whatever that is.  After a few shakes and quakes the ride is rather pleasant.  I'm thankful I already tucked my rescue inhaler into my pocket.

When we arrive we are amid ten people, a family I assume, each with long black hair tied with a ribbon, and all squatting -- all but one boy that is -- around a large bowl, eating slop with their fingers.  The sun is setting in the east and the air feels cool yet comfortable, stained with the aroma of whatever was dinner and the fire (the smoke of which is making my lungs feel tight). The men and women wear woollen cloaks, making us feel out of place in our 21st century sweatshirts and jeans.  (Sigerist page 400)

No, they don't see us, as we are merely observers. Yet as an asthmatic I can't help but to notice the teenager slumped in the corner, leaning against a flat rock.  The others seem to ignore him, and he makes no effort to seek help either.  I find this odd.  Although our guide states this isn't odd, because the boy doesn't want sympathy.  While we may surmise he has asthma, these folks have no concept of asthma.  The symptom was the disease as primitive man had no concept of nosological entities, that is, of disease.  The young man, if he doesn't recover, is a burden; a hindrance.  He wants no sympathy.

Likewise, our guide states, we must understand that a disease is a curse and illness was a punishment of something you did wrong.  The boy may simply not know what he did wrong, and maybe he didn't do anything at all.  Yet that won't stop his family from assuming he was a bad boy.  Because he had no idea what he did so wrong to feel so bad, he was resigned.  So it was easier for the boy to hide, or pretend to be fine.

Our guide says we must be somewhere around 1500 B.C. in Babylonia.  We also learn from our guide that a variety of primitive societies lived in Mesopotamia -- the land between two rivers (Tigris and Euphrates) for thousands of years, and united to manage the rivers.  They dug canals that filled when the rivers rose to prevent floods from wiping out villages and cities.  After the floods the canals were drained to irrigate the land.  (Sigerist page 378)

Each primitive society had it's own gods and demons, and as the people united a variety of city states formed that adapted some of these gods and demons and created some of their own.  At the center of each city-state is a hill with pyramidal structure with a flat top used to worship the gods.  The first ones appeared around 3,000 B.C.and this is considered the beginning of the Sumerian civilization.  It's greatest city-state may have been Ur, which sat on the Tigris close to the sea.  Even after Ur fell, Sumeria lasted until around 2400 B.C., and had a resurgence later that lasted until 2004 B.C.

While the Sumerians created the first civilization in Mesopotamia, they're customs and culture continued to influence people for thousands of years.  One city-state, Babylon, grew to be the largest city in the world, partly due to the influence of Hammurabi. He was a great ruler who created what we refer to as the Code of Hammurabi, which was a code of strict punishments for wrong doings.  It was an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, a limb for a limb.  It lasted from about 1830-1531 B.C.

Another city-state along the Tigris grew into a national state of Assyria, that lasted from about 2400-612 B.C. Nineveh would later become the new capital of the empire that flourished from 750-612 B.C.  The Book of Genesis mentions Ur as the birthplace of Abraham, and Niveveh also has a Biblical impact, mainly having to do with its demise and destruction. 

Unlike the Ancient Egypt society, which was also growing at this time, the Mesopotamians aren't concerned with the After Life.  What they are concerned about, as most primitive societies were, are all the demons that surrounded them.  They carried amulets and charms, and cited incantations and prayers to prevent and treat diseases that were caused by these demons.  Yes, these demons were everywhere, like the bacteria and viruses we have to live with today. 

Yet as we don't live in fear of bacteria and viruses, they don't live in fear of demons.  They have learned through years of experience, and constant reminders by the priests, what needs to be done to keep the positive balance between the demons, the spirits, the dead, and the living.  Disease in this way can both be prevented and treated.

Plus if you lived during this time in this society, you probably worked all day, as the people we see did all day, a day that exceeded 110 degrees Fahrenheit (which I find stunning considering how cool it is).  So the Sumerians, and later the Babylonians, don't have time to worry about the transcendental, other than the rituals, incantations, and prayers.  They arduously manage their crops, the river, or fight wars, and have little time to fear the unseen.

Yet as an asthmatic myself, one who yearned for my inhaler, I know that young lad had no such inhaler to help him.  He had no rescue medicine to give him instant relief.  So what would he do if his breath didn't come back?  I know from my own personal experience with this disease he can only pretend to be fine, to hide, so long.  So what are the options for the young asthmatic in Babylon?

As we sadly watch the lad huff and puff, our guide explains that both the Sumerians and the Babylonians knew little of anatomy.  They did not dissect humans or perform autopsies, and they did not mummify the dead as the Egyptians did.  They did, however, dissect some animals in search of omens.  They examined the entrails, especially the liver, for signs of good and evil.  Yet they had no concept that diseases were caused by these organs, nor that they were essential for life.  So they rarely thought to dissect them to learn what was inside.   (Sigerest 455)

He explained there were three types of priests. This knowledge didn't interest me at first, because how was a priest going to help an asthmatic boy.  Yet then as I listed, I realised the priest was the best help for the boy aside from waiting it out. The three types of priests were:  Seers, Exorcists, and physicians.  Seers are experts in omens, exorcists drive out evil spirits, and physicians treat illness and wounds.  All options are viable to the boy, who finally gives up and seeks the help of his father as he finishes licking his chops. 

Another option for the boy is what Herodotus observed when he traveled to Mesopotamia to learn how they lived.  He observed the ill being set in a public square, and everyone passing by was encouraged to ask what symptoms he was suffering from.  Anyone with knowledge of the symptom and remedies was encouraged to speak up.  (Withington, page 34)

I watch as the family huddles around the suffering boy.  A lady, the mother perhaps, places her hand on the boy's head and says what I believe is an incantation.  He touches an amulet on the boy's chest, a small bone I think, and says another incantation.  Soon the entire family is singing a song, or perhaps it's an incantation or prayer.  I wonder if this has happened before, and the family is doing what a priest suggested to ward off whatever evil spirit is causing the dyspnea. 

The father leaves the courtyard.  The mother stays with the boy, as if trying to comfort him.  The rest of the family enters the home.  Nothing changes for several hours, until the father returns with an elderly man well garnished with necklaces and earrings. He's also carrying a satchel. This, I assume is a priest.  What kind of priest is he? I wonder. 

The priest approaches the boy, who's now sitting on the ground with his mother rubbing his brow with a damp cloth.  The priest kneels so he's at the height of the boy and touches his brow. He utters some words, and then the mother rushes into the home and comes out with a pot.  He sets it between the boy and the priest, which I realize is a physician as soon as he pulls various herbs or drugs from his satchel and tosses them into the pot.  He inserts a reed tube into the pot, seals it with wheaten dough, and places it onto the fire.

Once the pot is steaming the boy places his mouth around the reed tube and inhales.  The boy appears to get little if any relief from this.  Yet he smiles as he walks with his parents inside, we assume with the hope of falling asleep.  The physician leaves.  Darkness ensues. 

I attempt to follow the physician to learn more, but am shoved back into the time machine just as the door shuts.  I'm forced to return to the modern world with no knowledge of how the boy fared.
------------------------------

Back in my office I wonder about the boy.  Surely the physician had access to rational medicine to help the asthmatic?  Right?  What I  learned was quite interesting.

As my guide suggested, the gods of ancint Mesopotamia were all powerful, and they were the cause of all diseases, and they were the only means of a cure. However, the best method of treating sickness and injuries was to prevent them altogether. Each city-state had its own gods to worship, and huge temples were built for these gods to live.  The priests performed rituals where they offered prayers, incantations, and sacrifices to appease them.  Smaller temples were built where average citiens could offer sacrifices too. 

To make the job more difficult these gods had the ability to make demons, and they could either be good or evil depending on the wishes of the god. These demons, or monsters, appeared in a variety of forms, such as animals, birds, or both. 

Herodotus was a historian who lived in Ancient Greece from 484-425 B.C.  He traveled the world so he could write about it. He dismissed Ancient Mesopotamian medicine because he believed they had no doctors.  However, modern historians know from excavated cuneiform tablets that various types of physicians existed in Ancient Mesopotamia from an early time, just as in Ancient Egypt.

The Mesopotamian physician is among the most educated in this society; he or she is literate (a member of the literate), familiar with tradition, and well trained. (Sigerist, page 432). He will give the boy hope, and hope alone has psychological benefits that should help the boy cope until his breath comes back. 

Edward Withington, in his 1894 book "Medical history from the earliest times," explains that "If a Persian wished to practice medicine, he must first practice upon unbelievers; should three of these die under his hands he is forever incapable; should he cure three, he is qualified to act as a physician... for ever and ever..." (Withington, page 36)

From Henry Sigerist, in his 1955 book, "A History of Medicine," we learn that the physician probably did have knowledge of lung diseases, and he did -- as I saw on my journey, have access to an inhaler of sorts.  Yet there was no knowledge of asthma, only the symptoms of dyspnea, cough, excess sputum, chest pain, and anxiety.  Each was a disease, and the one that was most prevalent -- the dyspnea in the boy's case, was the diagnosis. 

Yes, he probably did know about dyspnea.  Some examples are mentioned by Sigerist:
"A man 'coughs dry, ejecting no saliva,' or the 'lungs cough up pus and the inward parts,' or 'a man is affected in his lungs and they vomit exceedingly.'"
Surely  this isn't asthma, yet it's a lung ailment.  Sigerist also writes: 
"Dyspnea is probably referred to in several passages which say:  'if a man's lungs pant with his work,' although the translation is not certain.  'When the breath of a man's mouth is difficult,' is probably also a reference to dyspnea."
Also, "'A man is affected in his lung passage' or 'suffers from the 'pipe of the lungs,'' means that the patient has a disease of the bronchi or upper respiratory organs.  You hear no specific descriptions of that make you think asthma, although bronchitis, or at least bronchitis symptoms, are known. 

Sigerist mentions a passage from an Assyrian tablet:
"If the patient suffers from hissing cough, if his wind-pipe is full of murmurs, if he coughs, if he has coughing fits, if he has phlegm: bray together roses and mustard, in purified oil drop it on his tongue, fill, moreover, a tube with it and blow it into his nostrils.  Thereafter he shall drink several times beer of the first quality; thus he will recover."  (Sigerist, page 480-81)
Other than incantations and prayer, or simply toughing it out, some physicians might provide the asthmatic with what you would consider among the first inhalers, similar to the Egyptian method of heating dried herbs on stone and inhaling the smoke.  The Mesopotamian inhaler is described by Sigerist as such:
"A decoction of various drugs was placed into a pot, which was sealed with wheaten dough after a reed-tube had been inserted into it.  The pot was placed on fire and then: 'thou shalt put it (the tube) into his mouth, let him draw the steam up by the reed-tube into his mouth... it shall strike his lungs: for nine days thou shalt do this.'"
Ah, and this is so stunningly accurate to what I saw.  Amazing! 

Yet there is little knowledge that the drugs placed into the pot, when inhaled, did any good to relieve the boy's dyspnea, whether it was caused by asthma, bronchitis or pneumonia.  Yet at least it proved to be a somewhat more rational (rational acording to our modern definition anyway) approach to treatment of respiratory conditions, as compared with prayer, incantation, and hope alone. We can only wonder how the boy fared.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

1200 B.C.: The first healers

By 2,600 B.C. in Ancient Egypt you had three choices for the treatment of  your asthma-like symptoms.  You could seek out any of the following

1.  Physician:  They used rational cures to treat natural illnesses. They mostly used herbs and spices mixed in an array of formulas to treat diseases rationally.

2.  Sorcerer:  A person who practiced black magic.  He had an an ability to communicate with the spirits in order to rid your body of evil spirits or back magic.  Synonym:  witch, wizard, medicine man.  They used magic amulets, fetishes and talismans to prevent and treat diseases.  

3.  Priest:  A person who had the ability to communicate with the gods, or God, in order to keep them happy in order to prevent them from causing diseases or illness.  They used prayer or incantations to prevent illness and  to remedy diseases.

To read more about the above click on the links provided.  

Thursday, November 08, 2012

1907: Home for children afflicted by TB

Figure 1 -- Frannie E. Lorber breaking ground at the Denver Sheltering 
So in the late 19th century many people were becoming inflicted with a disease then called consumption (what we now call tuberculosis.)  The going trend at the end of the decade was to move to a place with cool, dry and sunny weather because it made breathing easier.  

Such victims from all over the United States, particularly from New York, flocked to Colorado, where it's high altitude provided such an atmosphere.  

There were ultimately so many tuberculosis victims, and their families, in Colorado, that the state became known as the "World's Sanatorium."  

Denver, Colorado, carried a huge number of such families, and many of them were without any money to pay for help, and many were also Jewish.  So this caused certain healthy members of the Jewish community to open up their hearts and their wallets to create a home for tuberculosis victims.  

And so the Jewish Community rose to the occasion and opened up National Jewish Hospital for Consumptives in Denver.  In 1899 National Jewish Hospital for Consumptives in 1899 opened it's doors and was quickly full of patients who had no money.  However, there still remained a need to take care of other people afflicted by the disease, mainly the children.  

With parents who were sick, or who had succumbed to the disease, their children had no where to go, no one to care for them, and no money.  So in the early 20th century the Jewish Community once again opened up pocket books and opened up a shelter for these children.  Ground was broke, and a shelter was open for business in 1907.  

Prior to this opening many of the children were transferred to the Cleveland Jewish Orphanage, but many members of the community were concerned by this.  So the new shelter was open on the West side of Denver.  The name of the shelter was the Denver Sheltering Home for Jewish Children. It was an 11 room frame house.

The home filled up fast.  Some of the kids staying in the home were orphans, but most had parents inflicted with tuberculosis, and many of whom were staying at the nearby National Jewish Hospital.

Figure 2 --From right to left: Joey Carsh, Barbara Blackmer, Joey Barret,
Ester Cash, and Alvin Uikon sitting in a garden at the National Home for 

JewishChildren at Denver in Denver, Colorado. The Home later became
 NationalAsthma Center, and in 1978 merged with  National Jewish
 Hospital.Back reads: Smiling Pals -- The Beginning of Life-Long Friendships, 
late 1930s (1)
Among the leaders in the drive to get this project completed was Frannie Lorber, Bessie Willens, and other women.

You can see a picture of Lorner breaking ground in figure 1.  The shelter was located at the corner of 19th and Julian Streets on the West side of Denver.

The home quickly grew in size, but in 1914 a fire destroyed.  By 1914 it was rebuilt so that it had much larger facilities, with separate dormitories for boys and girls. (3)

The base of the organization was expanded, and by the 1920s it was a national organization, with support coming from as far away as New York.  Also in the 1920s the campus was changed so the children were housed in small group homes, or what was also called the cottage plan. (3)

Each cottage had it's own live in matron in an attempt to recreate a more family-like structure.  And of the over 1000 children that passed through the home over the years, and the fear of tuberculosis, only six of the kids contracted the disease, and only three children at the home died. (3)

By 1928 the name was changed to National Home for Jewish Children in Denver, mainly due to the fact the home was sheltering more than just children affected by tuberculosis.

Lorner would spend the next 51 years working to raise money for this and other similar projects in Denver and across the United States.

In 1939 the home began taking in children with intractable asthma.  Throughout the 1930s and 1940s there was a rise in the number of asthmatic patients at the home, and by 1953 the name was changed to show the change in the type of customer at the Shelter.  This home would end up becoming one of the worlds most prominent asthma shelters in the United States, and in the world.
Figure 3 -- Children of Denver ShelteringHome for Jewish Children, 1907
(2)
(According to the Rocky Mountain Jewish Historical Society, ClaraGertz was an orphan at the shelter from ages 9-15 in the 30s and 40s.)  Gertz says life at the orphanage can best be described as “regulated.” everyone got up at 6 a.m., washed, then marched singlefile through an underground tunnel to the dining room to eat. The younger children walked together to nearby Cheltenham School. After school, the children were given a snack, then it was time for chores. Daily duties might include working in the dining hall, the kitchen, or the laundry. Gertz learned to use the sewing machine and mended clothes. Children who dusted had their work inspected by a matron’s white glove. Evenings were spent studying in the library until bedtime. “I think that living a regulated life was wholesome and beneficial,” says Gertz. “I never it looked at it as so terrible, having lived that kind of regimented life. You adhered to the rules. I mean there was no other way…” While a predictable daily routine may have had its benefits, the same philosophyapplied to cuisine made for a monotonous diet. What did Gertz think of orphanage dining hall fare? “I think in terms of sameness,’ to the degree that today I will not eat a sweet roll because we had them every day.” She ponders a moment recalling another dining hall memory: “If there’s something I dislike in this world it’s bread pudding. I would take the napkin and I’d put it on my lap and I’d drop the bread pudding on it and then I’d run to the bathroom and flush it down the toilet. I hate bread pudding!”
Mending clothes was one of the routine chores preformed by the girls. (2)
At the end of the school week, activities changed but were equally regimented. “There was always Friday night service. We always had chicken. We had Sunday school on Sunday morning, even if you had company or were going out.” (Sunday was visiting day.) Was Saturday a free day? Only “to a point,” said Gertz. That was the day when volunteer instructors came to teach music or dance lessons. One of her favorite Saturday afternoon activities was going as a group to the movies. In winter, children from the home ice – skated on Sloan’s Lake. 
 Discipline at the home was meted out in different ways, ranging from corporal punishment to loss of privileges. “The matron in the girls’ building had a radiator brush and she’d pound your bottom or you were restricted from going to the show on Saturday,” Gertz recalls, adding later, “I must also tell you I was a very bad child, I mean bad! At one point in the religious class at night I’d get all the kids to stare at the teacher and it made her very uncomfortable. And at one point the superintendent said to me, If you don’t behave, we’re going to put you out as a domestic!’”. (2)
Teacher Abe Kirschstein stands behind Sunday School
students seated at desks at the National Home
for Jewish Children in Denver (1)
There were various such shelters throughout the United States, and they provided a great opportunity for children.  From all the accounts I have read from the kids who were fortunate to have been taken up by the shelter, the experiences were really good.

During the 1980s the shelter was razed and there is now nothing left.  To hear some of these accounts you can click here.

For the rest of the story, check out: 1930-1950: The rise of the asthmatic institution

References:
  1. Photo information from University of Denver, Penrose Library, Digitalized Collection, http://digital.library.du.edu/penrosepresents/items/show/3173, accessed 11/8/12
  2. "Memories of the Denver Sheltering Home for Jewish Children," Rockey Mountain Jewish Historical Society, University of Denver, http://www.du.edu/cjs/memories_of_the_denver_sheltering_home.html
  3. Abrams, Jeanne,"For a Child's Sake: Denver Sheltering Home for Jewish Children in the Progressive Era," American Jewish History, Winter 1989-90, Volume LXIX, No. 2, University of Denver

Tuesday, November 06, 2012

2,600 B.C.: The birth of Rational Medicine

Editors Note:  The following post was rewritten here

Without knowledge of the human anatomy ancient men and women rationalized illness by the only means they understood, and that was by assuming it was caused by evil spirits, demons, the dead or the gods.  To them this was rational medicine. (1)  What they would call rational we refer to as magico-religious.  As we travel back in time in our quest to learn about asthma this is essential for us to understand.

To the modern asthmatic rational medicine is anything that truly makes breathing easier; it's medicine that has a real effect; it's civilized medicine.  According to Henry E. Sigerist in his book, "A History of Asthma," rational means "physical, dietic, and pharmacological treatments that are not mystical in themselves; it's also surgery; cutting with the knife.  They are generally treatments used by physicians, although they can work their way into the magico-religious."

According to historians rational medicine as we define it developed early on in Egyptian and Mesopotamian medicine, but developed over 1,000 years later in Ancient China.  The west often credits Imhotep, although most speculate physicians with their rational medicine existed long before the vizier and architect of King Djoser around 2,600 B.C.

Edward Withington, in his 1894 book "Medical History of the Art of Healing," describes the discovery of a tomb of Sekhet' enanch who was chief physician of the Pharaoh Sahura.  Inscriptions show he "healed the king's 'nostrils' for which his majesty wishes him 'a long life of holiness.'"

The tomb of Sekhet' enanch is dated to sometime around 3533 and 3000 B.C., as the physician is believe the pharaoh and physician were members of the 5th dynasty of Egypt.  He is the first known physician, although there is evidence of physicians before him.

Withington explains that the first physicians were probably medicine men.  In Egypt the "profession" was later divided up as specialties developed: Sorcerers specialized in magic, priests in religion, and physicians in civilized medicine.

Common ailments such as colds, asthma, headaches, and stomach aches may have been treated with herbal remedies, but the unexplained diseases were probably treated with magic. Wounds from war, bone breaks, lacerations were treated with surgery.  The type of medical treatment you receive is generally up to you, who you know, and/or your location. (4)

Empirico is defined as what we learn from experience and observation.  A good example is the asthmatic who is having trouble breathing.  One of his friends tosses Belladona leaves into the fire and this asthmatic just happens to inhale some of the smoke.  His breathing gets better.  He assumes it was the Belladonna that helped him.  He remembers this for next time.  He experiments.  He observes.  He tells his kids.

Belladonna is referred to as a herbal remedy.  It's natural, although even while so the "pharmacological aspect of therapy must be understood, however, in the context of the supernaturalistic paradigm: the medicines worked through magic, their effect depended on the recitation of the proper words and the performance of the correct actions. In fact, the consecration of the remedies was a significant part of the sacred utterances of the healer.  The potency of herbs was usually due to their relationship with gods or goddesses who were behind their curative powers." (1)

Many historians like to refer to magic and religious medicine as magico-religious and natural medicine as emperico-rational.  Magico-religious medicine will be explained further in another post.  Emperico-Rational medicine consists of natural remedies for natural diseases. Natural diseases are those that are normally occurring, such as your common colds, aches and pains, pneumonia, pleurisy, etc.  (2)

Natural diseases were generally treated with herbs, massage, broths, salves, etc. Herbs available included opium, coca, cinchona, ephedrine, caffeine, carcara, sagrada, chaulmoogra, digitalis, ipacacuanha, podophyllum, pyrethrum, squill, belladonna, and strammonium. While their effect may have been known, they knew not the why or how.  Generaly, the why and how was believed to be magical. 

In our modern world we see herbal remedies such as Belladona as rational: it may actually make you feel better.  Yet as we take into mind the scope of knowledge of primitive men and women, we must understand that even what we view as magico-religious medicine may actually have a rational or real effect. So in the scope of the primitive mind, magico-religious was rational medicine, according to Plinio Prioreschi. in his 1991 book "A history of Medicine."

It would be similar to you or me going to your priest for help with your hardluck asthma because your doctor has done all he can for you.  As far as medicine, you are on all the best medicine and it's not helping you.  So you seek a priest for guidance.  He may help you pray. He may help you find comfort.  In this way he may help soothe your mind.  In a sense, this is good medicine.  Studies even show those who "believe" get better quicker than those who don't believe. 

In fact, in 30,000 B.C. magico-religious medicine may even be better than emperico-rational. If you had asthma you may even prefer to seek out a priest or sorcerer over a physician.  Just think about it.  Your physician may prescribe you take Ipacec to vomit. He may prescribe an emetic to make you relieve your bowels.  These things can make you worse. 

On the other hand, while magico-religious medicine may offer no real remedy, at least it does no harm.  The best case scenerio is the placebo effect makes you think something is being done.  You feel better.  You relax.  Your breath comes back -- eventually. 

In this way, sometimes doing nothing is better than doing something stupid, which primitive physicians might do.  Now the physician may prescribe for you to inhale the fumes of dried and crushed belladona placed on heated bricks.  If he does you are in luck.  Yet if he prescribes something quacky you may have been better off calling for a priest or scorcerer. 

As both Henry E. Sigerist and Plinio Prioreschi wrote in their respective books on the history of medicine, primitive man developed magico-religous medicine first prior to developing emperico-rational medicine.  Ultimately the two paradigms existed side by side, and this actually continues to be true to this day as we have rational medicine working side by side with religion, as an example.  In China and India you see this to a greater degree.

Emperico-Rational medicine first started, as noted above, by trial and error by primitive men.  A societies further developed along the Tigris, Euphrates and Nile rivers medicine further developed into a specialty of physicians.  This is believed to have happened early on in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and over 1000 years later in China.

While the true birth of emperico-rational medicine probably happened early on, perhaps even early than 30,000 B.C., it was available by random people at random locations.  Knowledge was obtained mainly through word of mouth, mainly from parents, and perhaps through poems that were easily memorized.  Yet it's Imhotep, around 2,600 B.C. who is given credit as the inventor of rational medicine.  For this reason the year 2,600 is usually noted by historians as the birth of rational medicine.

Many ancient writings have made their way to us from around 2,000 B.C., although the information contained on these texts is much older, going as far back as 5,000 B.C.  The texts that we now possess are believed to be copies of copies of copies.  Even the originals were copies of what was at first handed down by word of mouth. So the knowledge goes way back, farther than what we might suspect.

Herodotus traveled the world to learn and write about the culture of other civilizations other than Greek.  He observed there were many different types of physicians in Ancient Egypt:
The practice of medicine is so divided among them, that each physician is a healer of one disease and no more.  All the country is full of physician, some of the eye, some of the teeth, some of what pertains to the belly, and some of the hidden diseases." (3)
Herodotus observed the Ancient Mesopotamians had a dislike of physicians, although this may actually represent the Greek view of Mesopotamia rather than fact.  Many records from history show Mesopotamia had many physicians and they were respected.  So rational medicine was widely available in ancient civilizations.

Homer wrote of the Egyptians that "each one is a physician, skilful beyond all men, for verily they are of the race of Paeon." (4, page 16) By this he may mean that every person, to some degree, had knowledge of medicine sort of like most people today have some knowledge of how to treat common colds, cuts, scrapes and the like.  Likewise, we all have some knowledge of medicine, with some salves, pills and lotions in our medicine cabinets.

In fact, Withington (page 16) describes the discovery of the medicine chest of Pharaoh Mentu'-hotep of the 11th dynasty around 2,500 B.C.  The chest belonged to his wife, and consisted of "six vases, one of alabaster and and five of serpentine, with dried remnants of drugs, two spoons, a piece of linen cloth and some roots, enclosed in a basket of straw-work, the whole standing in a wooden chest found in the queen's tomb."

Whithington explains this may be one example of the medical skills of the general population of Egypt that Homer was referring to.

So if you had asthma-like symptoms in Egypt, Mesopotamia, or China after the discovery of natural/ rational medicine, you now had the option of seeking out a priest or scorceror for your magico-religious treatment, or one of many different types of physicians for your emperico-rational treatment.  Although if you were among the primitive folks your priest or scorcerer would be just as rational, if not more so, than your physician.  Your choice.

References:
  1. Prioreschi, Plinio, "A History of Medicine," 1991, volume I, page 248
  2. Sigerist, Henry E, "A History of Medicne," 1955, second editionn, vol. I, 
  3. Prioreschik, op cit, page 365-6, referring to Herodotus, II, 84, Translation by A.D. Godley.  
  4. Withington, Edward Theodore, "Medical history from the earliest tiimes: A popular history of the art of healing," 1894, London, The Scientific Press, pages 14-23 (Chapter IV: Medicine in Ancient Egypt)